All claim that around 105 smart missiles and bombs were unloaded on 3 specific chemical weapons sites in Syria-----
all good so far----and then I look at the before and after images in the press and Tv
now eve to my untrained eye--all three sites were fairly small/medium sized and had 35 missiles (105 divided by 3 )-- landed on each of these sites---then I think t is fair to say that I would have expected to see a much greater level of damage?
Now --the possibilities
Smaller missiles/bombs than we are used to seeing used in previous conflicts
Fewer missiles fired than the number declared to the press
Many missiles were shot down before they reached the target
Missiles were carrying smaller warheads than normal
Fewer missiles were used to keep from enraging an unpredictable Russia ---especially as Trump went out of his way to warn them of incoming
both sides have been lying to the public for years and this was just a charade
any other theories?